The best way to understand other cultures is to work for a multinational organization.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed by some people that working for a multinational company is the most effective wat to learn about other cultures. Although it can offer some insight into different cultural aspects, it is not certainly the best way to understand several cultures.
There is no doubt that working in a multinational organization furnishes the chance to meet and talk to people from varied cultural backgrounds. As for certain projects employs sometimes have to relocate to a completely new city or even country in terms of language, eating habits and dressing sense. Therefore, they can experience an absolutely new culture. In addition, in multinational companies, a project team can have members from different nationalities and conversing on a regular basis with these colleagues usually provides some insight into their world. For instance, American employs do not know about Indian festivals but being on the same team, employs get to discuss their customs and traditions about upcoming holidays which provides people some information about each other cultures.
However, not everyone working in such organizations have authoritative positions where they get the chance to converse with people from different countries, so I believe this is not the best way to explore and understand other cultures. In order to learn and experience the diversification of cultures, in spite of relying on their working atmosphere which can only give a broad spectrum of knowledge about several places, people can travel to other countries and stay there so that when they are exposed to new surroundings they can soak it fully and be exuberant about it.
To conclude, of course, a multinational organization can open doors to understanding many cultures but I believe it is not the best way. People should rather broaden their horizons by traveling and exploring different countries which will provide a complete insight into other cultures.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, as for, for instance, in addition, no doubt, of course, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36721311475 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98247861944 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4059515542 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.818181818 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189360322164 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087329952487 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661666655783 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145043463499 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472534175467 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.