Parents today frown upon computer games and TV programs because they think spending too much time on them corrupts kids' brain. However, I do believe they can exert positive impacts on children's mental abilities.
It is true that too much exposure to computer games and TV programs might encourage children to become socially isolated. They may therefore spend less time on other activities such as reading, sports and even interaction with family. There are many pupils who skip doing homework to play digital games and watch TV shows and many people believe the more time a child spends on watching TV or playing video games, the weaker his/her performance at school.
Nevertheless, like many other things in life, moderation is key, and I believe proper TV programs and computer games offer high-level thinking skills that children can use in the future. Many computer games provide with children the opportunity to think creatively as challenges come up. Children need to make plans and try different approaches to advance through the game. Some games allow children to customise the character's appearance, which gives children an avenue for better creative self-expression. Additionally, many video games are pro-social and rewards players for helping others, and playing these games can help children to show more empathy in their daily lives. What is more, TV programs today targeted at children centred on real-life historical events, and they can spark a child's interests in world history and geography.
To conclude, I believe children can benefit from watching TV and playing computer games with proper guidance form adults.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'characters'' or 'character's'?
Suggestion: characters'; character's
...e games allow children to customise the characters appearance, which gives children an ave...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, such as, it is true, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33076923077 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62683015941 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9082280572 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238014627007 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912264508297 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400276250714 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156600375181 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352808715013 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.