Around the globe, it is indeed true that children want to play the similar games and watch alike TV programs as their pals. Researches evident that 80% of the children in China wish to see the same games as their friends. According to me, this approach has got many benefits in terms of friendship and enhancing the bonding among friends. This can be proved in following essay with examples.
First of all, it is a common tendency of the kids to discuss things with other kids. Hence, if they have a like-minded person to discuss about same games or TV shows it is easier for them to mingle quickly. Additionally, they will increase the bonding between them. This phenomenon will not lead to an argument about TV plays or games. They will gel well effectively. This catalyzes their friendship forever. For example, people discussing about some of the eminent sports like Cricket tend to watch match together. Their similar area of interest precursors to their strong relationship.
In the same vein, they will roam around based on their own interest. It is also useful when choosing a perfect gift for your friend. Since we know their taste, we can select the gift appropriately. For instance, I and my childhood friend like Barbie shows and we play with Barbie dolls. When I presented her with latest Barbie doll for her 18thbirthday, she was fascinated. This proves that parents can allow the children to watch games and Television plays as their friends until and unless it is hazardous.
To elucidate, it is good to encourage kids to play similar games and watch TV shows as that of their friends. However, parents should watch the kids if the games and shows are without any harm. It is my hope that kids are matured to play safe games and ignore life sucking game such as Blue whale.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...to see the same games as their friends. According to me, this approach has got many benefits in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...r. For example, people discussing about some of the eminent sports like Cricket tend to wat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...with Barbie dolls. When I presented her with latest Barbie doll for her 18thbirthday, she w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Barbie) must be used with a third-person verb: 'dolls'.
Suggestion: dolls
...When I presented her with latest Barbie doll for her 18thbirthday, she was fascinate...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74760383387 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46285058547 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546325878594 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 5.43587174349 313% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6110825953 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.7619047619 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9047619048 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300575836644 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820115157094 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804412418059 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181088344113 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523294469446 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.