Environmental scientists are arguing that environmental changes are posing the greatest threats to our lives around the glove. I completely agree with them because it is costing millions of lives through natural calamities, however, we have other major threats to human kinds and the wars around the world is one of the biggest.
It is accurate to state that climate change is costing us millions both in lives and in dollars. For the last few years, we saw drastic changes in the patterns of natural calamities. Countries around the world are affected by the different sorts of disasters i.e., cyclone, tsunami, storms, wildfires, etc., which are effects of widespread man-made climate changes as per climatologist's analysis. A group of researchers from the University of Queen's studied ocean behavior and found that the number of cyclones has doubled in two years due to the increase in the surface temperature of the sea.
However, one of the biggest threats to mankind is a war between countries or between groups in different countries. Around the world, we are seeing a lot of regime changes through the war costing almost the same amount of lives as we lost in natural disasters. It creates a lot of homeless people, some of them may have to leave their home country as refugees and seeking asylum in other countries. For example, throughout this year we saw a huge amount of lost lives, damage to infrastructure, and migration from Syria to Canada or other European countries during the recent ISIS war with the Syrian government.
In conclusion, changes in the climate are the greatest threat to our lives on earth as it initiates different types of natural disasters while wars, another huge risk, in different regions of the world are also putting a huge amount of people's lives at stake.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'climatologists'' or 'climatologist's'?
Suggestion: climatologists'; climatologist's
...espread man-made climate changes as per climatologists analysis. A group of researchers from t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99668874172 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71752648956 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526490066225 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0156083962 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.181818182 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196920883494 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768118402264 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510963476033 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122640339779 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288636721964 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.