Climate change is the biggest threat to life on our planet.
How accurate is this statement?
Are there any other bigger threats to mankind?
It is argued that the greatest threat to livelihood on earth is the greenhouse effect. This statement is not true as the consequences of climate changes would be long-term and scientists will be able to find solutions by then. However, nuclear war is the most dangerous threat to human race.
The rising levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in atmosphere is the main reason for greenhouse effect. This would cause global warming by increasing global temperature that would lead to many problems such as melting of glaciers, floods and so on. The results of global warming would occur after the span of around 80-100 years. Before that science would be able to overcome this problem. For example, Elon Musk predicted that after twenty years, 80% of cars on roads would be electric and 10% resource of energy consumption would be solar.
Moreover, nuclear weapons are the most critical threat to our civilization. Many nations are now on the verge of creating more and more fatal bombs and weapons. They can destroy human race as a whole in a fraction of a second. That is to say that its results are instantaneous and the most dangerous. Consequently, they can be used by any nation to curb its rivalry kingdom. For example, in the world war two these were used by United States to destroy the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These are also used in present times to end life of Syrian citizens.
In conclusion, although the rising global temperature is a serious issue, its effects are long-term and technology would be able to resolve this problem by then. The nuclear rockets and bombs are the deadliest to existence of men and women. It is recommended that the government should ban the production of nuclear weapons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... after the span of around 80-100 years. Before that science would be able to overcome ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y can destroy human race as a whole in a fraction of a second. That is to say tha...
^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g global temperature is a serious issue, its effects are long-term and technology...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89898989899 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62342504047 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6693120622 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8333333333 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120676424612 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371420659269 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455073688833 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788333975661 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673126886306 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.