Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is argued that richer nations should take more asylum seekers and give them food and shelter. This essay totally agrees with this statement because developed nations have necessary finances and relationships between two countries and with other would improve in future.
Richer countries can afford to accept refugees since they can afford.it would be humane on the part of these wealthy nations to accept the victims of war and disaster they have financial and other resources and support them with essential life amenities. Moreover, those people looking for shelter would eventually die or become casual if they are not addressed on time in such a situation. Timely helped by the wealthier nations would be a boon to them. For example, the Canadian government accepted refugees from Syria and saved the lives of around twenty-five thousand people.
The relation between richer country and whose natives are readily accepted would improve along with the improvement of developmental relationships at a global level. Stronger the relationship, higher is the level of trust. As a result, business deals will increase in the future. Those to vulnerable countries would be thankful and would have the same policies adjustments in return like reduction of taxes on trade, ease of paperwork and opportunities to expand the market. For example, Japan accepted refugees from Vietnam in 1996 and the Vietnamese government in 2000 reduces taxes on Japan import by 5%.
In conclusion, richer nations have necessary financial resources and their relationships would become good in future at a global level by accepting more refugees and providing them with basic life supplies of house and food. It is recommended that all wealthier nations should accept more refugees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... countries and with other would improve in future. Richer countries can afford to ac...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36559139785 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71032212467 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7688536942 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236054011257 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797415599656 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622455285119 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15792834858 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588313776051 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.