Dear Mr. David,
I am writing this letter to let you know that I have attended a certificate course on "Project Management Methodology for Software Projects" as per your official instruction. It started on the 21st of April, 2019 and lasted for 5-days.
As an employee of a software development farm, surely this course will help me to manage the software project in our company. The skill that I always wanted to have is managing project efficiently with time, budget and resource constraints. Also, this course helped me to understand how we can acquire leadership skills by practicing emotional intelligence. The best part of the whole training was to learn about the procedures related to risk mitigation in a particular project.
Although it was an effective course, there is an extent to improve the training's usefulness. Firstly, the trainer was providing examples mostly related to construction projects which were not helpful for us. It is better to hire a trainer from a software project management domain. Secondly, the curriculum of the course should also be updated to add the specific practices in managing software projects.
I am glad to have this opportunity, and I am hoping this training will be further advantageous for the portfolio of the whole company.
Yours faithfully,
Abed Joy
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_MONTH_DATE[1]
Message: The comma is probably incorrect: 'April 2019'.
Suggestion: April 2019
... instruction. It started on the 21st of April, 2019 and lasted for 5-days. As an employ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trainings'' or 'training's'?
Suggestion: trainings'; training's
...urse, there is an extent to improve the trainings usefulness. Firstly, the trainer was pr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as to, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 32.9175257732 70% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 937.175257732 120% => OK
No of words: 213.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25821596244 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05542560824 2.54303337028 120% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 127.690721649 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629107981221 0.622605031667 101% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 290.88556701 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3450084318 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 76.5299724578 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 16.8248392259 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 4.34317383033 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155693907624 0.216113520407 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531584058515 0.0766984524023 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380341637548 0.0603063233224 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912656914047 0.12726935374 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040187281462 0.0580467560999 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 8.37731958763 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 8.71597938144 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 41.2886597938 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.