Some people prefer to keep children regulated. According to them, punishment is the best approach to instill discipline among children. This essay will argue why smacking is not helpful at all in raising children although it was slightly effective in the past.
Regulating children by punishing them was a common way in the past, and still, some people follow the same. These people are very much harsh whenever their children commit something wrong. Children were also aware of the fact that they will face zero tolerance action when something went rogue. Hence, they fearfully abide by their parent's, guardian's or teacher's unwritten rules which had brought positive result in some cases. An investigation on the primary schools in Bangladesh suggests that the schools which have punishment system get the best results in almost all competitive exam and parents are also interested in admitting their children on those schools. So, regulating children via the age-old way is still valid.
Despite the validity of the age-old way to discipline children, smacking children is criticized by everyone nowadays. With the advent of methodologies to analyze child psychology, experts are suggesting that punishment may bring the short-term result of good behavior but, it comes with long term psychological damage for children. Also, there is another concerning matter which is also backed up by the experts in drug addiction management consultants of rehabilitation centers is that early childhood damage leads children to drug addiction later in the future. Those who were the victims of the childhood trauma of bad parenting, they are more likely to be inclined towards drug addiction. As nowadays parents and teachers are more concerned regarding the drug-free psychological health of children, it is logical that they will despise smacking children.
This essay argued that people who are the supporters of smacking children look out for short-term benefits of controlling their children over long term benefit of raising their children with sound psychological health. In my opinion, punishing children in regulating their manner is simply unacceptable although there is a little benefit involved.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, look, may, regarding, so, still, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47214076246 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78974579621 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560117302053 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5461556701 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156258667066 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612682455532 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401603798683 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110845385639 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221585160479 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.