In companies, promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company, not to someone from outside or new hiring. Do you agree or disagree?
Promoting employees increase a company’s ability to thrive in the market, whether the promoted is an existing person or an outsider. However, I agree that currently employed performing staff shall be rewarded from an organization’s beneficial perspective. In this essay, the advantages that flow to a firm by promoting employees will be discussed.
Getting the best out of a person becomes attainable through position improvement of a worker. A man, rewarded based on work performance, becomes aware of the tasks and tries to continuously improve the results for better outcomes. Performance recognition not only makes them satisfied, but also empowers the workers to deliver the very best. The achievement of a person ultimately helps a company to attain set-goal in the long run.
Loyal worker group is another factor that good companies retain for organizational betterment. Only focusing on improvements of current officers increases the bonding between employer and employee so strong that it is likely for the employee to drop-off new job offers. For instance, Square, a leading pharmaceuticals company incorporated in Bangladesh, practices to deligate responsibilities to the old staff after providing them adequte training and knowledge. In HR Jorunal of 2019, It is reported that the employee turnover rate of this pharmaceuticals-giant is as low as 1%. Retaining skilled work-force helps a manager to increase performance efficiency and reduce cost of development, making the retained a key for attaining firms’ success.
To conclude, human-resource managers bring new people with promotion, on the other hand, existing employees quit the firm getting better opportunity. To cut this unhealthy cycle of employment, the firms can launch internal promotions to retain the skilled staff which will ultimately capacitate the management to climb the ladder of organizational pinnacle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that currently employed performing staff shall be rewarded from an organization&a...
^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng and knowledge. In HR Jorunal of 2019, It is reported that the employee turnove...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7027972028 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44336544851 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632867132867 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7283523551 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111848397562 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392627785467 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041985882028 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695182028465 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05471946751 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.