Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier. Why is this? Is this the best solution to traffic congestion?
The accetance of bicycle among the people of all age group is soaring day by day. Not only that, governments of many countries have stepped forward to invest in infrastructural development to ensure sooting experience of using this eco-friendly vehicle as the use of physical energy to ride the vehicles enflows various types of benefits to the authority. Most notably, this is the most appropriate way to fight traffic jam.
Riding bicycles demand energy of the rider, burnt depending on the distance the traveller wants to cross. Interestingly neither fossil fuel nor electricity are used to keep the wheels running, rather its the person’s energy who rides the bicycle. As a result, the consumption of natural resources is reduced, so the country has the option to engage the assets to another sector. Take Denmark as instance, where most people use bicycle for daily travelling and the oil consumption has dropped to 70% within 5 years. Moreover, the use of bicycle reduces the number of motor-vehicles on the road, emitting less green-house gases in the atmosphere. Countries, making remarkable progress in reducing CO2 emission get foreign supports for further developments, which is beneficial for both the government and the people. Saving natural resources and redusing green-house gases certainly motivates the countries to promote the use of bicycles.
Similarly, the bicycle trend has the capability to be used by city authorities as an effective tool to fight traffic jam. In other words, as a place offers the favorable condition to ride a bicycle safely, the lone travellers riding their own sedan find it more appealing to use the bicycles, resulting in less vehicles on the road. Usually cars with four seating capacity, being used by a single person occupies a substantial portion of the high way. As bicycles come forward to drive such passengers away from the high-speed lane, focusing the development of bicycle-friendly infrastructure is the perfect remedy to traffic congestion.
To conclude, bicyces are being used not only by young people but also by old people. Though the extensive use of this environmentally friendy vehicle can help a country reduce the use of fossil fuels, the most charming offering that bicycle has is the ability to reduce traffic jam.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...used to keep the wheels running, rather its the person's energy who rides the ...
^^^
Line 9, column 307, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...aling to use the bicycles, resulting in less vehicles on the road. Usually cars with...
^^^^
Line 9, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y a single person occupies a substantial portion of the high way. As bicycles com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, similarly, so, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25745257453 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95914360441 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8874608528 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9375 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134793548135 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458087992802 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388691369017 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934847000406 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247328421794 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.