While Companies work in the local communities, some people believe that some benefit is to be incorporated in the lives of those local community people. I strongly agree with this notion as it will help both of them.
Firstly, the companies utilize the resources of local people such as land, water and electricity. For example, some factories are built near agricultural lands to get the benefit from the crop as a raw material, which, in turn, can be used in their manufacturing industry for making different products. Therefore, such companies should conduct some programmes which involve local people such as dancing activities. For example, Nestle company in India uses cow milk from the local vendors to manufacture their various products and in return, they provide medical facilities for their animals in addition to awareness camps.
Secondly, social gatherings can be conducted by companies to improve the communication gap between people. For example, most of the people are employed in the local organisations and family gatherings would help to improve the emotional bond between the workers. Research conducted shows that yearly games would divert the minds of workers from professional tasks and would improve their efficacy in the workplace.
To conclude, I strongly believe that sports and social gatherings are crucial for the employees to improve their work and local companies should focus on conducting such activities regularly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43171806167 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79033771992 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568281938326 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3050753158 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255048138967 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995913828176 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614262600658 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156759293866 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552046417339 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.