Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. On the other hand, other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Education has a major role to play for every individual in this non-stop advancing era. It acts as a theory of learning numerous skills required to work in any business environment and also involves fortifying existing skills. It is argued by some masses that getting an education is a must before aiming for a good job, while a few others think that learning hands-on experience and establishing soft skills is more relevant. However, I personally believe that university education as well as developing practical skills rather than studying theory, both sides have their individual benefits. But, completing higher education should be everyone’s priority before starting any kind of job or business. The following paragraphs will discuss both views in details along with real-life examples.
Some people in society have a thought that higher education which begins after grade 12 is necessary to be accomplished in order to get a good or desirable job. They believe that completing any specific degree from an accredited university or college makes you more eligible for getting a good job. Moreover, they have argued that most of the hiring managers of companies look for people with at least a bachelor’s degree in hand as part of their job description. For e.g. a recent study found that 90% of companies in North America prefer recruiting university degree holders, even though it is an entry-level position.
On the other hand, there are handfuls of people in the society having contrary views. They insist on developing practical skills and believe that getting an education from university is a waste of time which can be easily used to earn money as well as getting experience to enhance skills development. Although getting high position jobs after school education is difficult, they believe one has to start from lower level to reach higher levels in the future. For instance, the founders of Google as well as facebook dropped their university education plans, provided they built huge empires using their practical skills and they invested most of their time developing soft skills while getting more exposure to the industry.
I am of the opinion that everyone is not lucky to get success in a job or business after high school education regardless of practical knowledge one has, whereas on the other side getting university education should be part of every individual’s vision.
To recapitulate, availing higher education from university or college is a must for consideration by recruiters of good companies, retrospectively getting soft skills on top of university education acts as a precursor to getting more success in carrier goals of any individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion. For e.g. a recent study found that 90% of companies in North America prefer...
^^
Line 13, column 220, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
... getting university education should be part of every individual's vision. ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...part of every individual's vision. To recapitulate, availing higher educati...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess in carrier goals of any individual.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., however, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, as to, at least, for instance, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 432.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28240740741 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92661351362 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8884379492 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.625 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42073800479 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138999676171 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904724801774 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248709814248 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360237303738 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.