As a country’s population grows, more homes are needed. Is it better to build these homes in existing cities or to create new towns in the countryside? Give reasons to your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.
The citizen who lives in cities is really important for most countries; therefore, some people and I think it might be a good idea to build new homes in exiting cities instead establish new cities.
In recent years many people immigrate to megacities to find a better opportunity such as a great job or study graduates; owing to major cities are suffering from a dearth of residential areas, many government planning to build new cities to attract people to new residential areas although many people are not interested to live in those areas because new cities have not enough facilities for life in there such as schools, hospital or vocations. In addition, establishing new cities have many cost for government and it has a negative effect in the future. For instance, many new cities face violence and thieves in a long time.
In my opinion, exciting cities have more capable of building new houses for new residents in short-term and mid-term. For example, the government can build new technologies with high-rise which is really suitable for people life. Moreover, big cities have enough structure for living and enough occupation for people who live there such as subway and residential construction. In my view, municipalities can plan for their future to rebuilding some old destination.
In conclusion, establishing new cities is really dangerous for the government and people to put enough facilities in those areas; thus, megacities build new houses to have the capacity to put people in their areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cost seems to be countable; consider using: 'many costs'.
Suggestion: many costs
... addition, establishing new cities have many cost for government and it has a negative ef...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in short, such as, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12048192771 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83337246905 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510040160643 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.674619114 49.4020404114 220% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.7777777778 7.06120827912 238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123171623606 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631215496852 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390933709624 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091140235806 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259519678902 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 9.78957915832 291% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.