Developments of technology are causing environmental problems. Some people think the solution is that everyone accept a simpler life, while others believe that technology can solve these problems.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays, the increasing fund has been assigned by many governments for promoting cutting edge technology and science. However, this action sparks much debate, and some people assert that highly developed technologies might jeopardise the environment while others embrace the opposite views. This essay will discuss both the pros and cons of science and technology development and explain how it could exert positive impacts on the environment.

It is true that some developed technologies caused environmental problems such as cars and chemical-related products. The city’s air pollution became a significant impairment of people’s life after the explosion of the vehicle production industry. People invented technologies to produce vehicles with the intention of providing conveniences to individuals but overlooked the carbon issue. In addition, many rivers and waters polluted by the emissions of chemical plants, and indirectly poisoned the fish.

On the hand, many technologies brought many benefits to society and improved the environment. Firstly, the global greenery areas increased rapidly after the implementation of the measures and technologies that developed for tackling with deforestation issue. The increased amount of plantings will be beneficial to air quality and soil condition. Secondly, plenty of scientific research and technologies had been made to improve water quality. Marine trash, which mainly consists of plastic, currently kills more than a million seabirds and mammals each year, became a major environmental issue from the last decade. The scientists therefore worked out the technologies for clearing the marine litter and protecting the sea for further disruption.

This essay assessed the impact of science and technology development from both positive and negative views. I believe that the environment could be improved by adopting new technologies in the long run.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87142857143 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1177896409 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621428571429 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1895173582 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.6 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24454365793 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794450243009 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556122064162 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153385421365 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039029757258 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.