The ever-changing world is changing our behavior in several ways, Materialism and consumerism are one of the few effects on our lives. But, the overall effect has a positive and negative impact on the human lives. We can dissect this effect in both ways.
Let us look at this effect from the Optimistic point of view. Due to the continuous development of science and technology, people can have a more deeper understanding of the comfort so we are more interested to acquire the things that will make our daily lives for easier or comfortable.For example, now we have the technology for controlling the temperature inside our houses and this has turned into a necessity, but when we spend extra money in making this system for luxurious then it will be extravagant.Therefore, this human nature is leading us to possess consumerism in our daily activities. And ultimate result is materialism in society is winning more rewards.
On the other hand, when we are deeply engaged in valuing the possessions of luxury things or making our lives for comfortable, we are giving less time in maintaining relationships with our closed ones. In some cases, we may devalue the things that are more related to spiritual well beings. For example, when we want to build a luxurious house, we need to spend huge money on this, therefore, we may ignore to fulfill some of the needs of our family members. Hence, our affection for consumerism may destruct some of the important social foundations and may increase unrest in society.
In conclusion, we can sum up the though Materialism and Consumerism will be rising in coming future, but, we need to be very cautious about their impact. So, we need to carefully choose our daily actions so that we can take benefit our these trends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'deeper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: deeper
...science and technology, people can have more deeper understanding of the comfort so we are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, look, may, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 228.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95614035088 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82367589912 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1693290055 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14877220167 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668630672899 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06047841755 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100210348115 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637108917418 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.