Disposing waste on streets has become a common problem in many countries these days. What are the causes and solutions for this issue?
Without a doubt, it is increasingly common these days to see some people dumping their waste on streets. This essay will explore the reasons for this trend and propose measures which might address them.
One of the main reasons for this worrying phenomenon is a lack of consideration of the polluters for the town's cleanliness. This is because some people have not been taught that it is also their responsibility to keep the town clean. For instance, some people casually throw their rubbish on the streets without a second thought of its impact on the immediate surroundings. To tackle this issue, aggressive sensitisation campaigns on waste disposal should be implemented by the city council or the government. This would curb the act of careless waste disposal on the roads.
Another contributing factor is the lack of adequate dumping sites. With increasing consumption comes a corresponding rise in the amount of waste produced. If there are insufficient dumping grounds in a populated area, people have no other choice than to dump their rubbish on the streets which is more convenient to them. This problem could be mitigated if the government designated suitable sites where garbage could be dumped. Townsfolk would then be required to use those sites.
In conclusion, the lack of consideration of some citizens and insufficient dumping areas are two of the main causes of waste disposal on the streets. However, these issues can be mitigated by government actions in terms of sensitisation campaigns and provision of dumping sites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'towns'' or 'town's'?
Suggestion: towns'; town's
... consideration of the polluters for the towns cleanliness. This is because some peopl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... designated suitable sites where garbage could be dumped. Townsfolk would then be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, then, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.204 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92637386538 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4719659311 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9285714286 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222483629939 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073442971954 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459233474311 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137057828102 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466860489647 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.