Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics.
Debate on awarding extra weightages to history and literature than science has not been settled. It is believed that studying history and art is necessary than science. I believe that this notion is wrong as development in science brought so many benefits to civilization.
Studying science subjects offers so many advantages. First and foremost, these subjects are theoretical and practical both which provide an insight about the concepts. Students not only understand the concepts but also do it in laboratory and see the formulas turning into stages. For instance, I was taught chemistry theory course and also given an understanding how gas is formed when two substances are mixed. Furthermore, engineering subjects which are mostly derived from core science subjects are innovate in nature and attract students to discern something new. Fervent pupils devote time in small innovation and some time it leads to effective working model. Particularly in technical institutes, labs are opened in day & nights and wards conceptualize their ideas and invent new model. For example, my brother who study in India institute of technology recently contributed in discoveries related to hydro fuel which is a need of the time as it could be possible primary source of fuel in the future.
Finally, concept of science solve major problem in the society. Advocates of history and arts believe that science subjects repel students from learning native culture and society. These people contemplate that knowing about history and art enable student to contribute more in society. Granted, study of past events and existing culture enhance the level of information about civilization where they live, but it is seen that people learn about society and culture from the environments and sometimes even science graduates are more knowledgeable than arts stream students and in the past critical problems in society were solved through technology intervention.
To sum-up, though arts and history subjects are critical for protecting the nation’s identity and culture, benefits of science can’t be ignored and future lies on innovation and discovery in science and engineering.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'innovated'.
Suggestion: innovated
... derived from core science subjects are innovate in nature and attract students to disce...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47477744807 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84760662402 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590504451039 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.172873108 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.3125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23497377237 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750635453404 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537074128485 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13978516046 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303771458482 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.