Do you think that people who work online at home are more productive than office workers or the other way around? Give reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the 21st century, many working citizens have the option to work remotely from home or choose to engage in working offline. Though there may be many advantages and disadvantages of choosing either, this essay will focus on the amount of productivity by either working category.
Although many appreciate that working from home provides ample opportunity to work around the clock, I believe that this could lead to delays in correspondence among team members, ultimately lowering productivity. This has been quite evident in the recent situation of the pandemic when many businesses turned to web-based software alternatives to connect such as Microsoft Team in order to carry out work while following health guidelines. Even though people were connected round the clock, reports from The Times suggest that the productivity had dropped by more than half of the regular. This could be due to the reason that people were free to choose their work timing hence increasing the rate of irregularity for work-related punctuality.
On the other hand, occupations carried out in the office in the presence of team members result in greater fruitfulness owing to the ease in communication with colleagues. With the fixed working hours, it is well known by employees that in order to carry out any task where a discussion may be in place, their team will be available in the office hence eliminating any possible lag in taking an idea to production. This uninterrupted process of progressive work among employees leads to a rather quantifiable work in lesser time than it would have otherwise. In an interview with the CEO of Pexa, it was clearly distinguishable that the company’s annual turnover had doubled when they switched to work from the office.
In conclusion, working online may offer flexible duty hours but working on the premises among co-workers yields greater productivity. In the future, the option to choose may persist though it is in my interest to support working from the office as it results in greater productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...co-workers yields greater productivity. In the future, the option to choose may pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15709969789 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92512351969 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552870090634 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.278628542 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.25 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183125900366 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730846606486 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326098713439 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114133651281 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218225013142 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.