Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
For any recruiter, it is common to go for candidate’s background check and ask for personal information. It is considered appropriate by few people whereas other do not feel comfortable in sharing private details. This essay will throw light on both perspectives and first discuss that personal information has nothing to do with job and secondly that personal data is valuable and can help in deciding a candidate’s career progression. My viewpoint matches with the former statement.
At the outset, it is important to know that for any job a candidate is applying for, it is immaterial to know whether he is married or not. This information does not relate to any kind of job an applicant is trying to fill. For example, most of the recruiters across the globe pick the aspirers for their skill sets and knowledge they possess after assessing their personalities through Psychometric Tests. Hence, in my opinion, it is not ethical to judge a person on the basis of his marital status.
On the contrary, knowing in advance if a candidate is single or married will help the Human Resource head in chalking out his career progression during his stay in the company. For example, a person who is married is already settled in his life owing to which he may not relocate and this saves the cost of recruiting and training new people. Moreover, his career advancement plan will be dealt accordingly by the authorities. Therefore, it will be fruitful for the organizations to ask candidates about their personal information as it will help them in taking business decisions.
To conclude, it is unethical to become judgmental on the basis of the private information provided by the candidate but same material plays a crucial role for managers in deciding the career path for the candidates. Nonetheless, my opinion still supports the former statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on still supports the former statement.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, whereas, for example, kind of, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02912621359 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97612891955 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559870550162 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3684050657 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316790242439 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096842420716 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648498610051 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182937782222 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604978493021 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.