Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Now a days, we observe that a lot of candidates may apply for a single position so, in order to shortlist relavent candidates, employers ask for candidate information that may also include enquiries for personal information such as hobbies and marital status. There is a diagreement between two school of thoughts where one believes that this information is useful while the other disagress with this. I, personally, believe that getting information like hobbies/interests is usually useful in selecting right people for right job.
First of all, I would say that it is a win-win situation for employer and employee if a person is selected for the most suitable role as per his capabilities. In order to achieve this, information about the role and the candidate plays the vital role. As candidate should be well aware of the demands and expectations of the job, similarly, employer should be well aware about the profile of candidate and this can only be achieved by asking questions about the candidate. Some candidates may be professionally up to the mark for getting the job but their interests may make them not suitable for that particular role. For example, if an Engineer is applying for a role of backend developer and his interst are to interact with people or to work in a lively environemnt. But the role may require to work from home or this is maybe a short team with almost no interaction with other people. In this way, employer can guide the candidate that this job has a clash with you interests. Similarly maritial status can have some relationship to the role or job. So it is beneficial for both candidate and employer to have the personal information that may be relavent to job.
On the contrary, there is a school of thought who believes that asking personal information is not essential and this should not be enquired. They do argue that some people may not be comfortable in providing the information but due to thier interest in the job they have no choice to provide. Futhermore, personal data provided can be misused and there is always a chance for data leakage. So, in order to avoid such situation, personal data gethering should be avoided.
Coucluding the above discussion, I would say that asking for personal information that may be somehow relavent to the job is useful. Information may be disposed off after the completion of hiring process. Having all the relavent information is essential for assinging right person to the right role and that is benficial for both the parties.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
Now a days, we observe that a lot of candidates ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
Now a days, we observe that a lot of candidates ma...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 983, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...his job has a clash with you interests. Similarly maritial status can have some relations...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, similarly, so, well, while, for example, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2096.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89719626168 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85542697062 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460280373832 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3332502972 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.315789474 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474039922305 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160128212791 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798436791584 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322450723133 0.151304729494 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476503186257 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.