Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Other disagree. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a controversial issue about the importance of information about marriage and pastimes at interviews. Some recruiters believe that this information plays an important role in recruitment, while some social workers think that it should not be used in hiring. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and agree with the idea of extracting personal questions from the application form.
Let us start with the reasons why some interviewers claim that asking personal information enables them to recruit the best staff. The first reason is that personal information contributes to make a decision about a job offer. The knowledge of personality usually allows HR managers to see whether the applicant is appropriate to the open vacancy at the final stage of interview. Another reason is that this kind of information often shows managers to discover the potential for higher positions. These managers also need this kind of information to see, if the interviewed person suits to become either a manager or team leader. Furthermore, it also can tip future colleagues how to collaborate with the newcomer. The senior staff also uses the outcome of this private questionnaire to attach a new subordinate to the best team, where they can show excellent results.
However, some social workers argue that social workers should omit personal questions. They justify their viewpoint with the following arguments. Firstly, personal questions at the interview may annoy the interviewees. These questions may embarrass some applicants, because they are overly shy to answer them, which frequently deters the most qualified options. Secondly, some of these questions are irrelevant to employment. It sometimes happens that the personal questionnaire covers inappropriate details, which are not suitable to the offered place. Moreover, personal information may leak into the web. Many companies may not keep the result of questionnaire a secret, so interested people may easily upload it on the Internet, which criminals can use to commit a crime against the applicants.
In conclusion, even though some interviewers state that details of personality helps them in recruiting largely, I think that this sort of information is redundant at the interview.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, i think, in conclusion, kind of, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42613636364 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99616124061 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582386363636 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6555110519 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.526315789 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5263157895 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235855369057 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693543148137 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027852343849 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129846413934 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340288052876 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.