Essay topics: Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays.
Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages?
Down the century, the world has drastically changes in many aspects such as living standards, life styles & most importantly working patterns. Nowadays, in order to keep business running, employers requires their staff to stay connected round the clock even on holidays. This phenomenon certainly has some advantages for the employers but many disadvantages for workers, are also intact to it. Let's discuss this school of thought in more detail to draw a conclusive understanding.
To begin with, these days nature of work in many companies particularly multinational companies is way different. Businesses are spread around the globe irrespective of timezone different. Yet this situation put employees to work 24/7 as international clients needs to catered by any means. Employers are by then required to have workers available on as and when needed basis. For example if a company is operating from Pakistan is client is US based, that client would be dealing with local company according to his own timezone. This definitely provides business humongous benefits .
On the contrary, this phenomenon has adversely affected employees work life balance. For instance, an employee engaged in work related things even on weekend would not be able spend quality time with his family. The person would not be in situation to pay attention to family needs and would not be able to participate in his child upbringing. As a result the employee would turn out to be money making machine for his family only. Employees work life balance would be disturbed.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, it is of utmost importance that employees should be given proper time to spend with their family. Work should be distributed in a rational way that it should not affect anyone's work life balance. It is quite understandable that business has to go on irrespective of the geographical location but by hiring more staff & right distribution of work can adjust both requirements in a smooth way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 395, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ges for workers, are also intact to it. Lets discuss this school of thought in more ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...e understanding. To begin with, these days nature of work in many companies partic...
^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ely provides business humongous benefits . On the contrary, this phenomenon has ...
^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a rational way" with adverb for "rational"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...heir family. Work should be distributed in a rational way that it should not affect anyones work ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a smooth way" with adverb for "smooth"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...on of work can adjust both requirements in a smooth way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23510971787 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97901693135 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579937304075 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9838784204 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7777777778 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166582089909 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531935097823 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438279287577 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102777057906 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532313648078 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.