In today's world, people are more attracted towards common language in way of communication with each other’s. Language is an essential mode of communication for maintaining the socially environment among all individuals. In my opinion, usage of few languages is a positive development towards society and countries.
Recently, discovered data has reported that bilingually are more smarter than linguistically. In general there are advantages and disadvantages in terms of way of speaking that can explained broadly.
To begin with communication, bilingually usage among certain individuals has been developing in many area that are building economic of different nations globally in international markets. Consequently, in this modernized society, technological advancements due to the frequently use of language for communication in different communities.
Furthermore, people are easily able to exchange ideas in terms of innovations and development across world-wide. To exemplify, English is a versatile language these days due to regular use in daily lives by many rich and developing countries. At last, people in the internet world are using translators in form of common way of speaking such as to learn different traditional customs from anywhere in the world.
Since a coin has two sides, both pros are cons are usually running parallel in any area of an individual's life. One of the drawback discovered for extinction of several languages that people are rarely following their traditions and culture, rather than attracted and adapting the western culture these days. Although, occasions and festivals are saviors for keeping alive their native languages because language and culture are integral part of life in society.
To summarize, there is a positive development towards society in terms of communicating in frequently used of certain languages. Indeed, growth towards different nations can make us friendly environment in use of versatile language.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'smarter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: smarter
... data has reported that bilingually are more smarter than linguistically In general there ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y of speaking that can explained broadly To begin with communication bilingually ...
^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun area seems to be countable; consider using: 'many areas'.
Suggestion: many areas
...tain individuals has been developing in many area that are building economic of different...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Consequently in this modernized society technological advancements due to the fr...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r communication in different communities Furthermore people are easily able to ex...
^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ally running parallel in any area of an individuals life One of the drawback discovered for...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure are integral part of life in society To summarize there is a positive develop...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, so, as to, in general, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59322033898 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14234911223 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522033898305 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 295.0 20.2975951904 1453% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1650.0 106.682146367 1547% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 295.0 20.7667163134 1421% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 91.0 7.06120827912 1289% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176330793214 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176330793214 0.084324248473 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863103344551 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491055691109 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 152.4 13.0946893788 1164% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -253.33 50.2224549098 -504% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 121.9 11.3001002004 1079% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.62 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.28 8.58950901804 259% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 67.0 9.78957915832 684% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 120.0 10.1190380762 1186% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 120.0 10.7795591182 1113% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.