Experts say older people were happier and healthier in the past because they did more exercise and spent more time with family and friends, whereas now many suffer loneliness and health problems.
What are the causes of this and what are some solutions?
In the yesteryears, people were contented and in good health as they used to do exercises as well as give priority to their families, whereas today's generation is experiencing loneliness and health issues. This is predominantly caused by fast-paced lifestyles and changing cultural norms. To counter this problem, the governments and individuals ought to take collaborative measures at war-footing levels.
Firstly, the compiling reason behind this is contemporary living styles, where people have been working day and night to survive in a globalized and consumerist world. A primitive instance of this can be exemplified in their desire to collect more and more materialistic possessions, such as a brand new car, and modernized home in a city center, impelling them to spend most of their time on working rather than exercising. Furthermore, extreme changes in the pattern of close-knitted families to nuclear ones have been base precursors to the loneliness among today's people. On the contrary, our ancestors understood their true happiness in their health and family-relations by being satisfied with what they had and practiced exercised regularly.
To suggest some plausible alternatives, by establishing more parks, playgrounds, and social clubs, local authorities could not only foster community spirit but also enhance awareness of participation in the sports and in social events. However, it seems that real work has to be done on an individual level. They must inculcate themselves in some outdoor activities and start living with their family members. This way, they would feel active and develop camaraderie with other members, leading to their physical and mental well-being.
Following this look, although these new lifestyles and cultural aspects act as major catalysts for the deteriorated physical and mental health of the current generation, the above discussed strategies would be effective counters to this unfortunate trend. I thus hope that human intelligence and ingenuity continue to work towards making this possible.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59807073955 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09969513411 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655948553055 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4760309068 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.923076923 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226206689377 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684861733791 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044388114218 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123714215384 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472908740841 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.