The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree and disagree?
The major threat that the environment face in the current era is the global warming. As people are more reliant on non-renewable fuel sources for power generation and transportations, the carbon emissions in the atmosphere has soared. I certainly agree that finding a safe and green alternative must be prioritized and is of paramount importance.
To embark with, let us discuss about the adverse effects of fossil fuels on the environment. The extraction processes of these resources involve mining and fracking of rock beds, which have serious impacts on the ecosystem. In recent research by the Harvard University, it was found that such activities have higher chances of triggering earthquakes and other natural disasters. Apart from this, when these fossil fuels are burnt, the carbon emissions deposit in the atmosphere, and thereby increase the global warming. These gases also spoil the atmosphere and sometimes cause acid rain.
To preserve the nature, we need to discover green energy resources which are safe yet inexpensive. Although there are couple of alternatives to fossil fuels are available in the market, they are lesser efficient and costlier. The solar energy, for example, is a better renewable source of energy in the current market, but the capital investment required is so high that many are discouraged to depend on this resource. The wind farms are the next available alternatives, but they are less reliable as it requires specific wind speed to produce electricity. Thus, there is a huge demand for finding a better alternative which is highly efficient, cheap and does not harm the environment.
In conclusion, non-renewable resources do more harm to the nature and the existing renewable sources of energy are less efficient and costlier. Thus, governments and individuals must invest more in discovering an efficient yet cheaper alternative which does not affect the nature and the ecosystem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34426229508 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94019215551 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0788245166 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127513770062 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043339130656 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474721575979 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077420241262 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360327899335 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.