Failure is proof that the desire wasn’t strong enough’ To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is believed by many that amount of desire is directly proportional to probability of failure. I disagree to this statement, This essay will discuss the alternate perception of non-success and also other factors that contribute to it along with relevant examples.
To begin with, there is ample evidence that not all unsuccessful attempts are ascertained to lack of desire. The central reason for this is there are multitude of factors such as preparation and external factors that add up to not being successful. To illustrate this, Usain Bolt being a world record creator in 100m running, could not win a medal in Olympics 1990 due to hamstring injury forcing him to withdraw from it underlining the role of other factors in a win.Therefore it is conclusively clear that failure cannot have a blueprint and cannot be pinned to one factor.
Secondly, failure is viewed as a standalone incident in this present world. It is often forgotten that continuous experiments with it leads to an event called success. Although they are viewed as mutually exclusive, there is a strong connection between them. They are called as stepping stones to win. For example , Edison failed 999 times before being inventing a light bulb highlighting the desire to be successful despite the defeats. Thus it is possible to state that without a proper setbacks, one cannot be victorious.
In conclusion, on contrary to the opinion of many, failure is not necessarily due to absence of desire in fact continuous unsuccessful attempts outlines the yearning to be triumphant. It is also to be noted that a single attribute does not comprise a non-success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ning the role of other factors in a win.Therefore it is conclusively clear that failure c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ning the role of other factors in a win.Therefore it is conclusively clear that failure c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tten that continuous experiments with it leads to an event called success. Althou...
^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d as stepping stones to win. For example , Edison failed 999 times before being in...
^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e to be successful despite the defeats. Thus it is possible to state that without a ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'setback'?
Suggestion: setback
...possible to state that without a proper setbacks, one cannot be victorious. In conclus...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssarily due to absence of desire in fact continuous unsuccessful attempts outline...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08888888889 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97275931873 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3347936426 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13795370252 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466258603712 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379920588162 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874046300175 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353289241945 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.