Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.
Many people feel that alien travelers should be charged more than local travelers for cultural and historical appeals. I totally disagree with this opinion.
The fundamental reason why I believe that it would be incorrect to need a higher price for foreign tourists is that unfairness will create bad impressions on international friends. People who love to travel go over vast distances to see and appreciate alien cultures and factual monuments. They contribute to the economy of the local countryside with a payment on a range of goods and services during their vacation, and thus it is not necessary to charge them with a higher cost for the cultural and historical attractions. This even makes them feel they are not respected and exploited. These bad impressions will probably make the tourists never want to return that country anymore.
In addition to the above reason, I also believe that cultural and historical appeals are more meaningful in widely spreading the localized culture to universal friends more than contributing to economic development. So keeping the same price for global tourists and regional tourists is a practical job to encourage foreigners to learn and love the precious spiritual values of the host nation.
In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made a good impression on tourists from overseas and spreading the local culture. If the foreign visitors are charged more than the regional residents, then it would be counterproductive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26470588235 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92344293726 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9890030373 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.909090909 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336056461816 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106662569473 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103687938736 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205477213903 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470543945998 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.