Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Travel industry is flourishing nowadays since many people love to travel to foreign places and they travel thousands of miles for their love of travelling. Many people believe that foreigners should be charged higher than the local visitors. I, however completely disagree with this view.
Firstly, Travelling is an expensive hobby and while travelling to a new country all together one needs to make many arrangements and need to take care of numerous things such as- Visa processing, accommodation facilities, food to name a few.
All these necessities already burns a big hole on tourist’s pocket. On top of it when they are charged higher for visiting the historical buildings, it will take a toll on them which might lead to their disinterest in visiting the place again in future and consequently this will have adverse effect on the economy of the country since travelling is one of the major contributors in increasing the GDP of any country.
Secondly, I believe that charging extra fees from foreign visitors is unfair on ethical ground since this will make them feel discriminated and dissatisfy.
In addition to this, local residents barely give any importance to their historical heritage and they hardly visit any monument situated in their city so there is no point having them charged with nominal amount.
For example- The symbol of love Taj Mahal which is situated in Agra. Local visitors hardly pay a visit to this wonderful symbolic structure even though the visiting charges are nominal for them. On the other hand there are people who travels miles just to have one look of this beautiful monument
To recapitulate, foreigners make a great deal to visit another country. They put in so much of money and time to experience the heritage culture and to visit the historical buildings in person. Hence, the least the government could do is, reconsider the visiting charges for foreign visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in increasing the GDP of any country. Secondly, I believe that charging extra ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08201892744 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7226113064 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555205047319 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.7444650676 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.923076923 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195616036309 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774957138097 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545777305062 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924167577465 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511512308928 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.