Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is quite obvious for institutes to conduct regular examination to evaluate the student's development during the academic period. Their assessments were performed but assigning them on regular project work and other theses activity. So in order to examine the performance of a student it is recommended to have regular exam along with additional course works. Let us discuss this in details in our upcoming essay.
During the academic period, institutes will conduct exams for students during every six month time to validate their understanding and level of knowledge attained in each subjects. This is often achieved by conducting the written exams and scoring level in each subjects. By carrying out such evaluation process can only prove that how the student is responding to his curriculum, but that does not show the student's ability in general projects.
At the same time, an alternative assessment method is by providing course work and project works to every student to comply. This method cannot provide the ability to validate the caliber in theoretical, so following this method will not fullfill the skill assessment. Hence, the method of individual assessment should have a proper system in place.
Measuring the student development is very important for the schools and colleges to perform on regular basis, which should have a proper system with correct level of assessment mechanism. So it is advisable to conduct assessments by including regular exams and project works with different marking ration.
To my opinion, conducting periodic assessment is more important for institutes and students, which should include a regular examination and a external project work were it can help to identify their skills in different scenarios.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to institutes'.
Suggestion: obvious to institutes
It is quite obvious for institutes to conduct regular examination to evalu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...uct regular examination to evaluate the students development during the academic period....
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'theses'' or 'thesis's'?
Suggestion: theses'; thesis's
... them on regular project work and other theses activity. So in order to examine the pe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... curriculum, but that does not show the students ability in general projects. At the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hould include a regular examination and a external project work were it can help ...
^
Line 9, column 165, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...examination and a external project work were it can help to identify their skills in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43272727273 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81733946355 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523636363636 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7835251435 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.30769230769 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234216996652 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919353318019 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425668775723 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137435039855 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437919276696 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.