Fossil fuels (e.g. Coals, Oils and Gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. Wind and Solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries.
To what extent is this a positive or negative development?
Many countries today are turning to the natural resources to fulfill their requirements of day to day life. The realisation of the importance of alternative sources has compelled the authorities to take strict measures in this direction. In my opinion, using alternate sources in place of scarce resources is indeed a better and positive initiative.
Firstly, due to the increasing population and ever rising demand of people, fossil fuels are used exhaustively, which has made their availability a matter of great concern. The usage of oil and gas is so extensive that, functioning without them is unimaginable now. This has lead to the scarcity of such fuels. Additionally, people have become extremely dependent on fuels, like coal and gas to run their big or small businesses or in other words their entire livelyhood, as if no other means can replace that.
However, considering the shortage fuels, there are better alternatives to take place, such as wind and solar energy. Many countries has initiated the use of these natural resources and have established solar panels, not only for large projects but has also encouraged individuals to switch to such energy saving means. Countries like UK and Canada are making adequate use of alternative means in order to become efficient in replacing limited source of energy.
To deduce, opting for alternative sources of energy over the once which are scares and limited, is actually a step forward and every government must take necessary step in this direction, keeping future condition in mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...s wind and solar energy. Many countries has initiated the use of these natural reso...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, as to, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.248 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85675060165 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2840090747 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.272727273 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244651032329 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828936408563 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045690131275 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134649744278 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396056611059 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.