The government alone should not be responsible for reducing global environmental damage Everyone from individuals to major industries should play their part To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and inclu

Essay topics:

The government alone should not be responsible for reducing global environmental damage. Everyone, from individuals to major industries, should play their part.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Environmental degradation is increasing at an alarming rate, mostly due to human activities. The onus to stop this damage lies on everyone, be it individuals, industries, and authorities. Even though great deal of effort is now being made by the government bodies, I completely agree that it is also the responsibility of every citizen to curb these global environmental hazards.

To begin with, one of the major concerns of our planet is pollution from automobiles and factories. Moreover, the air quality is taking a toll on people's health due to an increase in asthma and other lung or heart diseases. Hence, if individuals can avoid traveling to long distances in private vehicles and instead opt for bicycles or public transport can go a long way in reducing perilous emissions. In addition to this, companies or organizations can implement alternative work methodologies such as work from home or video conferences. According to a recent survey, New Zealand witnessed a 20% improvement in air quality due to reduced traffic congestion during 4 months of lockdown due to COVID 19 situation as all professionals were working from home.

Furthermore, as responsible citizens of one's country, we should limit the usage of plastic in packaging. As an illustration, for shopping purposes, the use of cloth bags or paper bags instead of plastic will aid in reducing the detrimental effects of plastic on our mother earth. Likewise, homeowners should always recycle their waste, which could significantly prevent wastage of available resources. Also, large businesses can contribute by organizing various drives in order to raise awareness regarding the use of renewable resources such as solar panels on their rooftops. As a result, solar power could be utilized for the generation of electricity, thus saving our environment. The government on their part can help monitor these actions by implementing stringent laws.

In conclusion, our planet cannot be saved by only a particular person or authority. In my opinion, environmental issues can be solved by collective efforts of both individuals, industries, and government bodies.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'situation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'situations'.
Suggestion: situations
...ng 4 months of lockdown due to COVID 19 situation as all professionals were working from ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...Furthermore, as responsible citizens of ones country, we should limit the usage of p...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, likewise, moreover, regarding, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36904761905 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19908220965 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64880952381 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5909472666 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211267115712 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598733112513 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321316800065 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11237898587 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334035215377 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.