Government give a lot of support to artists even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere. Discuss both the views and give your opinion
Question: Government give a lot of support to artists even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Some would argue that most of the monetary resources are being spent on art forms by governments. Others believe that it should be used for other productive works. Although investment in the art sector can glorify their country's name, I believe that other sources such as third world problems should be considered first.
On the one hand, financial support to the artist makes the country well-known in other nations. This is to say that through art countries can depict their cultural heritage to the tourists, and can also take part in the cultural organisation at a global level. Consequently, by this, they get name and fame after winning awards for their country which gives them status among other developed countries. For example, 'India Art' fair held in Delhi have got the first place in the modern and contemporary art form in the world which makes the country famous among visitors. However, I believe that it is useless to spend on it if the countries basic necessities are not fulfilled.
On the other hand, It is thought that the government should spend money on providing education, medical facilities, transports and food because many underdeveloped and developing countries, still cannot accomplish these needs. Therefore if authorities will spend money on these things then countries can develop and get progress. For instance, 'Times of India' reported that the countries who are investing their monetary resources on the basic requirements of people are getting progress increasingly. I believe this school of thought is prominent because it ensures the human as well as economic development of the country.
In conclusion, even though spending money on artists gives glory to the country, the other major requirements of the nation should be on the top to make the country developed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
Question: Government give a lot of support to artists even though...
^^^^
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey that could have been used elsewhere. Discuss both the views and give your opi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountry famous among visitors. However, I believe that it is useless to spend on i...
^^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...useless to spend on it if the countries basic necessities are not fulfilled. On the other hand...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s, still cannot accomplish these needs. Therefore if authorities will spend money on thes...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, third, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12844036697 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7158683777 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550458715596 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7249749408 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261210550877 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11084482379 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.204489409836 0.0667982634062 306% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249519982791 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.359784900339 0.056905535591 632% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.