Government money should be used to support children in school for sports rather than to support professional sports and arts that perform for the general public. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Upliftment of school sports facilities is very important and public money should be utilized for the same, rather than supporting those professionals who perform for the ordinance. I completely agree with the argument as in schools sports are completely neglected.
To begin with, sports are a very important part of the school curriculum but in recent years more stress is laid on other subjects. Moreover, due to the shortage of funds, the infrastructure needed for various sports in schools is missing. Take for example sports like football or cricket needs proper ground but due to lack of funds and open spaces in urban areas the schools usually have a common ground for all games. Furthermore, the proper trainers are also missing from schools, especially which are run by the government, as the authorities believe it is a waste of money. It is clear from the stats provided by The Tribune which highlighted that there are only 200 plus sports trainers in public schools against the sanctioned posts of 2000.
On the other side, the professionals in the field of arts and sports enjoy good financial status as a result of their tie-ups with private players. To illustrate, cricketers playing in various private leagues earn crores of rupees every year. Also, the government is paying them salaries by employing them in various departments. Even these professionals do not need government support still the governments are showering them with enormous facilities like free accommodation in hotels and free passes for public transports.
To sum up, the government should nourish the young hidden talent in schools by providing the world-class facilities and this possible only if the finance department increases the budget allocated for the school's sports department rather than sponsoring all ready well-established professionals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, well, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35616438356 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92099599162 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8572163894 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393107092753 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129187082492 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113900408571 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245482818761 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11475325655 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.