The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement

Essay topics:

The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Governments have been trying to maintain the balance between the facilities in social sector and the cultural environment of citizens’ lives. Many people claim that sponsorship to the intangible events is not as necessary as public services assistance by the authorities. Although the support of spiritual and cultural side of city life is valuable, investment in public services cannot be overestimated.
On the one hand, for the beholder the arts provoke strong emotions and meditation while for the creator it allows to express their soul and their talent. Artworks provide distraction and recreation for the citizens, it may create a little miracle after a long day at work. For all kind of people, arts assist to fill the life with meaning whether we consider a molder or the observer. As an example, in my own life theatre and arts has occupied a solid niche for it makes life more colorful and filled with emotions. Therefore, the administration cannot help but allocate at least some part of the budget on arts for creating bright and sound life for the citizens.
On the other hand, life is hardly bright and colorful when people are always cold or think about where to find a proper medicare. Providing plummy public services is a nessesery measure to obtain a decent living for the citizens while the art is an enough measure. People usually disturb about base needs at first, spiritual and cultural needs comes to mind when the base needs is satisfied. For instance, my friend, Asya, appreciates the arts yet she lives in a small town with bad medicare, which results in saving money on the commercial clinic instead of enjoying the paintings. Thereby, Governments should indeed invest most of the budget on social services development in order to provide high standard of living.
In conclusion, an argument in favor of demand for big investment in public services has been considered on a par with the reason to extract some budget on the moral environment. Thus, I infer that I agree with the mentioned statement in general yet at least a small budget should be remained for cultural events.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'expressing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: expressing
...itation while for the creator it allows to express their soul and their talent. Artworks p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 667, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bright and sound life for the citizens. On the other hand, life is hardly bright...
^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'needs'' or 'need's'?
Suggestion: needs'; need's
... needs at first, spiritual and cultural needs comes to mind when the base needs is sa...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, in general, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95492957746 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68977064041 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1686224947 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.266666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190857854118 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646157086956 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501336159717 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123099971024 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038772371216 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.