The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Since ancient times heads of state have been dividing the budget into major needs and secondary ones. In this regard the problem whether funds should be allocated on material or spiritual lives has always aroused heated disputes. Although I believe cultural life is important to folks the quality infrastructure develops the country.
On the one hand culture develops the nation and forms a cultural code. Art advances a person's intellect and makes him richer. Music has the strongest positive effect on neural connections in the human brain. For example my neighbor Artem Zaytcev's son started going to public music school and his grades in math improved. Hence, the cultural part of lifee has a positive impact on citizens and strengthens the country's position in the world.
On the other hand investing in public services has a strong effect on the development of the country. High-quality roads are one of the most important components of a strong state and have a positive effect on its economy. Besides that, modern healthcare requires significant costs, such as the construction of new hospitals and research centers. According to an article in the journal «Medicine in Voronezh», 70% of city residents believe that access to modern medical services is necessary for all citizens. Thus, I think the state's infrastructure strengthens its position in the world and increases competition with other countries.
To conclude, I am all for the idea that investing in art, music and theater should be parallel to spending money on public services. Moreover, the government should think about each person and correctly distribute spending money across all categories.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ves has always aroused heated disputes. Although I believe cultural life is important to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...d forms a cultural code. Art advances a persons intellect and makes him richer. Music h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'states'' or 'state's'?
Suggestion: states'; state's
...ary for all citizens. Thus, I think the states infrastructure strengthens its position...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, then, thus, for example, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28947368421 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80781770058 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609022556391 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9743463184 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.8 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16574834224 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488504581037 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061445519804 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972515543105 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704387687286 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.