Some people enjoy change and they look forward to new experiences Others like their lives to stay the same and they do not change their usual habits Compare these two approaches to life Which approach do you prefer Explain why

Essay topics:

Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same, and they do not change their usual habits. Compare these two approaches to life. Which approach do you prefer? Explain why.

The modern world has been changing rapidly and the attitude towards establishing the mode of living is a topic for heated debates. Some people believe that gaining new information and being open- minded is vital while their opponents seem to enjoy maintaining traditional and way of life that they are accustomed to. I am personally related to the position of expanding the horizon and ceasing new opportunities, however, this essay will examine both provided attitudes.

On the one hand, people with permanent preferences seem to be more consistent and they do not feel the demand for finding new. Such an approach is popular among mid- aged individuals with families since the sense of security in the future is important for them. Moreover, a person may be satisfied with the passive mode of living though using habitual patterns as this mode of existing provides with happiness and no changes are required. For example, my mother's family members are conservative in their preferences and any alterations charge them with anxiety and displeasure. Thus, people may extract enjoyment from staying stuck to their ancestral attitudes without a need of exploring new.

On the other hand, the modern world is changing rapidly today and the new pieces of information are to be emerged frequently. Therefore, being open to new experience is vital for every person to stay open- minded and versatile. Furthermore, if a person is eager for being a highly qualified specialist, they should be ready to embrace nee data on permanent basis. For instance, according to a Russian scientist Kim V. I. , an average person is to consume fresh information every three days in order to stay in the Informational field. Thereby, every individual is to adapt their lives to changes as such an approach is vital for being a real professional and an open- minded person.
To my mind, remaining open to new experience is significant in the contemporary world that is changing constantly. I personally crave after expanding the unique cultures and new opportunities as such an access creates the very sence of living. Suchwise, I firmly believe that people should be ready to cease all available possibilities to feel the hectic life.

To sum up, although maintaining the known pattern of life creates the sence of stability, people need to be open to any fresh data. I am eager of leaning new experience as I feel the necessity for gaining new.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tent and they do not feel the demand for finding new. Such an approach is popular...
^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cording to a Russian scientist Kim V. I. , an average person is to consume fresh i...
^^
Line 6, column 201, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
... cultures and new opportunities as such an access creates the very sence of living. Suchw...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i feel, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05472636816 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8515798236 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3572889673 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.947368421 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219879363589 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699759446871 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486052111873 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126182085726 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381251923982 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.