Government should allocate more funds in teaching science courses rather than teaching other course for a country to develop and progress. You agree or disagree
Science plays a vital role in the growth and prosperity of a country. As per my perspective, the government should allocate more funds for teaching science courses, compared to other courses.
First and the foremost, science subjects can be really helpful in solving problems related to environment. To exemplify, the science has helped humans to harness renewable sources of energies such as, wind, solar, water and biogas, which has helped in minimizing the dependency of humans on fossil fuels. Consequently, reducing the deleterious effects of pollution on our environment and providing abundance supply of energy for supporting myriads of factories and satisfying our needs also.
The second argument to support the view is the advancements in the field of medicine and health care facilities. For instance, the early detection and treatment of various infectious diseases had been made possible only due to science. Moreover, the advancements in science have contributed a lot in the development of vaccines and eradication of many dreadful diseases. As the axiom goes, health is wealth.
Its irrefutable, television, internet, computers and mobile phones are the source of limitless information. Audio visual aids have made classroom teaching informative and easy for the students. Furthermore, Television, internet and computer are technological devices and devices of infotainment. They are used by many to relax and interact with people all over the world, increasing social mingling and sharing cultural and traditional knowledge. Telecommuting has made possible for the employees to work from any convenient spot, be it home or a hilltop.
To put it in a nutshell, Science has a major role to play in the economic growth of a country and government should take every possible step to promote it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s of factories and satisfying our needs also. The second argument to support the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4609929078 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06056925272 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3476007823 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188436595957 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524803226954 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083254474587 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108920945087 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951260378284 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.