The government should not waste money on arts as this money would be better spent on other projects like sanitation or infrastructure.
Do you agree with the above statement
Some opine that regimes ought not to disburse funds on arts because money could be well utilized on various plans such as sanitation and infrastructure. I do not concur with the given assertion. This essay shall delineate key factors such as traditional values and attaining indispensable knowledge, beneficial for the world.
To begin with, technology has faded the significance of our cultures and ancient customs. The sophisticated technology has rendered everything digital and obsolete our artefacts, for which several nations and individuals were known. Moreover, arts have been an encouragement for people to express themselves and an effective method of socializing with others. Therefore, arts are pivotal to preserve our tradtiions and foster others to engage in such pursuits. For instance, artists express their thoughts and ideas by demonstrating their fascinating art works, which foster others to be creative and pursue what they desire to achieve.
Furthermore, arts play an imperative role in practical learning and better understanding of theoretical information. Enormous museums and art galleries are ideal spaces for the public to visit and explore numerous distinctive work accomplished by tremendous artists. Besides, pupils could learn about the history of their nation and the world, which would aid in attaining data about their identity and past lifestyle. To illustrate, authorities build museums related to science and technology, which underpin the academic knowledge of students to know more about things practically.
In conclusion, arts have mammoth advantages for our societies and their individuals, which not only assist in gaining intrinsic material but also impel people to prosper in life.; thus, governments should spend money on such an important aspect of our communities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70588235294 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02737652936 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658088235294 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8976467173 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.384615385 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16262742418 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541704167396 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402271094123 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969674616077 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375077222858 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.