Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement.
Apropos to the modern era, mode of transports have undergone tremendous changes and have eased human race to extreme extent. Yearly, a heavy chunk of annual budget is reserved for transport sector. However, I am in consumate accord with this pragmatic concept that enormous budget oriented notions and strategies should be adopted by higher authorities. In order to flourish and and advance railway department rather than roads to mitigate rising commuting problems faced by citizens.
Railway is one of the relic transportation media and have incubated with this advancing technology oriented world. It is one of the fastest travelling source, aiding passengers to reach their desired destination within minutes. In addition, it is the most convenient and affordable forms of travelling for instances, computerised trams have endless positive aspects one can think of. Nevertheless, it requires lo maintenance cost and helped curbing the dilemma of overcrowding vehicles in downtowns.
Economy of different countries have been immensely flourished due to huge investment in train sector worldwidely. Furthermore, it is the widely used source of public transport across globe and hence the profit can be ploughed back in to the concerning department. Moreover, it has less detrimental effects on environment due to the fact of low rate of gas emission into environment leading to a downfall in air and noise pollution. Inevitably, this results in positive effects on health of individuals and decreasing mortality and morbidity rate.
In conclusion, in order to cope with the modernizing world higher authorities should dedicate greater percentage of annual budget for public transport modes such as trains. This will help states in curbing pollution issues, help in developing thriving economy and promote use of public transport among citizens. Ultimately, ploughing back benefits in order to strengthen the economic position of country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...igher authorities. In order to flourish and and advance railway department rather than ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60677966102 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00195473997 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640677966102 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0181831777 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.266666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0736773714576 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0228650207976 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357206378121 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0445733411937 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400355919465 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.