The governments should close companies that produce toxic waste materials without their own waste treatment facility in order to protect the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your position.
It is true that many manufacturing industries in most countries are damaging our planet by disposing of their toxic waste irresponsibly. This is endangering our planet and environmentalists suggest that the governments should lock down those industrial plants which lack proper waste management facilities. I completely agree to this notion in the best interest of our next generations.
To begin with, governments made it mandatory to all the industries to have their own hazardous treatment facilities; however, there are no serious punishments if they don’t have one. As a result, some companies take it for granted that they could pay the government some penalty and continue running their business. The toxic materials produced by such facilities are polluting every aspect of our nature mainly, air and water. China for instance, has numerous factories all over the country which release hazardous chemicals into nearby water bodies making it highly dangerous to the people living nearby. A study made by their government reveals a shocking truth that more than eighty percent of their rivers are polluted and are not fit for human consumption.
Furthermore, dangerous waste will have long-term effect on the people who gets in contact with it. Chronic illnesses resulted by arsenic and lead are proven to be fatal for humans. In addition to that, the aerosol chemical waste is responsible for pulmonary ailments such as tuberculosis and bronchitis. According to the Chinese department of health, more than seventy percent of human fatalities occurred in the year 2001 were either due to lead poisoning or lung cancer.
Therefore, I strongly believe that any industry that doesn’t have it’s waste treatment plants established, should be shut down by government authorities to keep our environment safe.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46830985915 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96624157304 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644366197183 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6286747011 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173110755714 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579399868304 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385363447597 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980827852706 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312454878465 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.