A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive argument on
treating animals with all due respect can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My view is that irrespective of the number of arguments that exists, we must preserve them and not use them for our selfish leisure. Through the course of this essay, I shall put forth all the points and calculations to support my viewpoint by considering both the sides of the argument.
To begin with, animals are brutally treated to earn monetary benefits by utilizing them in varied ways. Imagine the pain caused to them mentally and emotionally, but we ignore it because they cannot complain. To illustrate, people train animals to perform in Circus, Zoo and Parks.
Secondly, we have forgotten our moral values and sense of responsibilities towards these faunas. The Hindus have worshiped cows since the ancient days, but today are killing and slaughtering them for our selfishness.
Adding to this, all the animals must have the right to survive and thrive independently. Animals are deprived of Jungles without thinking about the pain they undergo, when they are separated from their loved ones. There are many social bodies that are fighting for these rights on behalf of the animals.
I see that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments I have provided and hence my opinion is that animals must not be used to cater our needs; however, they deserve to be treated like us. For a great environmental cause, I am inclined to believe that, we must always try to preserve all the animals on this planet, as they are not much different than us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al agreement, a constructive argument on treating animals with all due respect ca...
^^^
Line 10, column 366, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... planet, as they are not much different than us.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03971119134 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81616216348 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606498194946 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9395993675 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.384615385 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218167872749 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764917825439 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517675151135 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100265201582 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681405067175 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.