Growing population is a big problem in developing countries. Should Government provide new homes in the cities or countryside.
Rapid increase in population is one of the major issues that certain progressing countries are facing nowadays. This leads to the need of building new houses in the existing towns. However, there are certain demographics of the society who argue that construction of new houses by government bodies should take place in the outskirts areas. But I believe that countryside should be preserved for agriculture and farming. Therefore, I strongly accede with the former notion and this essay will discuss plausible points to justify my opinion.
Firstly, lack of public transportation in rural areas lead to increase in private vehicles, if new houses will be constructed there. This surge in individual vehicles will not only result in congested roads but also in pollution. However, in metro cities due to well connected local transportation facilities and cheap fare encourages people to avoid the usage of privately owned vehicles. Recent report published by the System Of Air Quality And Research shows that continuous increase in the usage of vehicles will lead the air quality index to fall into severe category in near future. That will deteriorate respiratory organs and other systems of human body as well.
In addition to this, there are minimal facilities such as educational institutes, employment opportunities and supermarkets available in the countryside. Therefore, for the development and convenience of an individual, construction of properties such as high risen apartments can be constructed in the cities. This will also solve the need of land to build new houses and people may enjoy the benefits of the developed cities. For instance, a student living in an outskirt area must spend number of hours in commuting daily instead of doing something productive.
By hammering the final nail, I pen down by saying that government authorities should not exploit stunning countryside for the construction of new homes, instead use it to cultivate the land.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33974358974 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97838338484 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0954357138 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.066666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124985606386 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396740877442 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364591453345 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794558773364 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339747427385 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.