Some people say that TV advertisements are helpful for viewers, while others disagree. Discuss both viewpoints and give your opinion?
Opinions are divided on whether television commercials are useful for viewers. I believe that it is advantageous for watchers.
The idea that advertising is not beneficial for viewers is advocated by people due to the fact that it encourages unnecessary spending, and promotes junk food. With regard to the former, the belief is that it creates artificial wants. By doing so, the ultimate goal of advertising companies to subtly persuade the customers to buy things that are not required at the moment is achieved. It is also thought that most TV commercials advertise junk food with high levels of fat and sugar. This unhealthy food is not only harmful to our health but young children are also targetted by the food companies to pester their parents to buy the advertised food items that have adverse health effects, such as obesity.
However, the above arguments can be rejected because advertisements create general awareness. As far as the promotion of junk food is concerned, people would not be able to make informed choices without watching adverts. By watching adverts of these types, they now have the knowledge to distinguish between healthy and unhealthy food, which would not be possible otherwise. As for the idea that it encourages unnecessary spending, it is not always true. Evidence for this can be seen in the fact that catalogues and brochures advertised on TV, enable people to compare products and services at leisure. In fact, those who do not have time to shop around can rely on advertising to learn about new products and then choose smartly on their need basis.
In conclusion, I agree with this proposition that advertising is an effective tool for viewers because it makes them aware of new commodities, and enables them to make informed decisions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, as for, in conclusion, in fact, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06440677966 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78306942747 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.392251584 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.714285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15254461551 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564268669006 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427470824722 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096451515359 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012303507259 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.