Some people believe that elderly employees are more useful to a company, while others believe that young employees are better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinions are divided on whether senior workers are a critical resource for employers, or whether the junior workforce is more resourceful. In my opinion, both categories of employees play a significant role as an individual to grow the business of a company and employers should have a mix proportion of both the age groups. In this essay, I will discuss both the viewpoints and support my opinion with the examples of the contributions both experienced and freshers make in an enterprise.
There is no doubt that mature workers are more experienced and skilful, and are beneficial for the growth of any industry. This is due to the fact that they have worked on several projects during their job tenure and acquire in-depth understanding and knowledge of their field. Therefore, they are more productive and can help an organization in strategy planning. In addition to this, their seniority and expertise make them leaders and they can guide the other members of the team to achieve a common objective. A recent study by Economic times showed that Google gains 60% of its revenue every year with the contributions of skilled workers. Hence, it is clear that experienced professionals are an asset to an enterprise.
Despite the contributions of the elderly staff, the contributions made by juniors cannot be overlooked. Freshers are an active workforce and benefit the company in many ways, especially with innovative ideas and adaptability. With regards to the former, the younger workforce has more exposure to technology and they can bring innovation to revolutionize the existing process. For instance, in the year of 2018, Aristocrat, a gaming company, launched a new feature to chat with an opponent in its gaming applications and this was the recommendation of the junior professionals. Another benefit of this group to the organization is their flexibility to learn new technology at speed so that business associations can compete in a global market. Therefore, the usefulness of younger employees is incontrovertible.
In conclusion, as both the workforces help in raising the company to new heights with their individual performance, therefore, workers of both the age groups are a valuable resource of any firm and it is predicted that in the near future, employers will focus more on hiring a compound ratio of senior and junior employees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22047244094 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13918880854 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509186351706 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1495915721 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.3125 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115694240634 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409231608074 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460207518311 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748076097324 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464965683984 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.