Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Since decades, human activities such as cutting trees to accommodate increasing population and polluting environment due to industrialization have detrimental effects on plants and animals across the globe. Some pessimistic think that it is already too late to take corrective measures whereas optimistic approached people consider that this challenge has no time boundaries. This essay will demonstrate both view in details followed by own opinion.
To begin with, world has already documented major climate change as a result of human activity specifically demolishing of forest. The summer temperature of areas near equator ranges from 45 degree to 50 degree which is extremely high as compared to a decade earlier. Moreover, every year this temperature is increasing by 10 degree than previous years. Admittedly, this climate change is one of the greatest consequences for extinction of various species, plants and animals. For example, dinosaurs which are now in stories only. Seen in this light it is believed that world is at par level where deleterious effects of human activity has already been experienced. Thus, no time is available for counter actions.
On contrary to this, considering the optimistic approach who emphasis that there is still much time left to protect the inhabitants from adverse effects of human activities. The firm supporter of this mindset is president of Pakistan, Mr. Imran Khan who initiates billion tree project in KPK that is Khyber Pakhtoon Khuwah. As a result, forest area increases which will control negative effects of human activity upto remarkable level. Consistent, with this line of thinking, it is fair to believe that efforts to save environment is not restricted to time.
To conclude, humans, plants and animals are all part of the world but there are certain human activities that effect other species badly. In view of above stated concerns I am inclined to believe that protection of environment for all species is not time bound and necessary steps could be taken still. However, these issues must be addressed on priority basis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... Pakistan, Mr. Imran Khan who initiates billion tree project in KPK that is Khyber Pakh...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, whereas, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33836858006 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86397822648 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625377643505 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2360763385 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.941176471 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24992325991 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705100937989 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072664525759 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153556084814 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569845075823 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.