International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Financial benefits will accrue from international tourism. Despite, it cause adverse effect on locals due to cultural differences and it also disturbs the eco system. In my opinion, I strongly believe that advantages of tourism are eclipsed by its disadvantages.
To start with, the prime benefit of tourism is generation of income in the country. Admittedly, tourist from around the world visit the country to enjoy picturesque view, experience the culture, authentic food, traditional music, and spectate modern and historic buildings. All these experiences have cost which tourist spend on the country. As a result, variety of local businesses of art s, crafts, and hoteling also promotes and income earned from these small scale industries are capitalized by governments in the form of taxes which eventually be ploughed backed in economy. Hence, tourism generates financial benefits for the local businesses and economy as a whole.
On contrary to this, the obvious disadvantage of tourism is impact on local residents because of difference of culture which might bring negative consequences between locals and tourists. For instance, Saudi Arabia is stringent with the rules that girls going out of their home should wear hijab and cover their head. However, this trend is not followed in western countries like Europe, USA and Canada. Therefore, there are greater possibilities that local dislikes tourist and might retaliate to this, with worst repercussions.
Another disadvantage which cannot be neglected is the destruction of eco system which means that in order to develop tourist attractions government deforests the area, construct shopping malls and hotels in order to accommodate the tourist and provide them the best experience. Undoubtedly, mega construction increases the environmental challenges and pollution. Goa in India, is well known beach which is being visited by thousands of tourist each year but for decades the ratio has been declined considering the fact that due to construction of various hotels and deforestation, the pollution in the region has substantially increased that not only impacts locals but tourist as well.
To conclude, the advantage of revenue generation by tourism industry is overshadowed by the disadvantages due to clashes between locals and tourists and deleterious effects on environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...from international tourism. Despite, it cause adverse effect on locals due to cultura...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 505, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the worst'.
Suggestion: with the worst
...es tourist and might retaliate to this, with worst repercussions. Another disadvan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iate to this, with worst repercussions. Another disadvantage which cannot be neg...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 126, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'attractions'' or 'attraction's'?
Suggestion: attractions'; attraction's
... means that in order to develop tourist attractions government deforests the area, construc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56824512535 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01692013374 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607242339833 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.1952678278 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.9375 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161063182032 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601229917985 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567810871476 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105146975865 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482931738358 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.