Recently, many people know a few of their neighbors. What is the cause of this problem? What can be done to solve this problem?
Nowadays, large majority of people remain less aware about their neighbors. The paramount cause is the communication gap due to hectic schedules which can be addressed by organizing events within the vicinity and using social medical as communication tool.
To start with, growing affluence and busy life has led people to spend time with their immediate social circle as a result people sharing the same boundaries hardly get chance to communicate with each other. Various problems pertinent to the area such as security, cleanliness, water and sewerage remain unresolved due to lack of communication. According to survey conducted by social club of UK, revealed that two third quarters of residents are unfamiliar with their neighborhood and 80% of respondents consider communication as the leading cause.
In order to curb the situation, union council or society administration ought to come forward and arrange entertainment, social and professional events which provide platform to meet people and share their concerns, expertise with each other to be mutually helpful. At present, various house building corporations in Pakistan has developed society system where chairman of the society is responsible to arrange charity, entertainment and social gatherings so people can develop cordial relationships with their neighbors and mitigate communication gap. Undoubtedly, this measure has resolved the issue to greater extent. Further, use of social networking sites such as a communicative page on Facebook or interactive group on whatsup also bolster communication among people. Admittedly, social media is the easiest and the quickest medium of interaction.
To conclude, people nowadays are less interactive with their neighbors. Therefore, administrative authorities must provide platforms where people living in same area can meet and mingle with each other to bridge the gap and build healthy relationships.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, third, such as, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74475524476 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12699444888 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618881118881 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.3434612725 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.916666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144626294447 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573966536839 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367153057132 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945139658709 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182723758951 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.