Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think
that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss
both sides of the argument and give your opinion.
Undoubtedly, the insane human actions have adverse effect on the plant and animal kingdom. A minor portion of populace vocalizes that this phenomenon could not be ameliorated, while a majority believes that with eco-friendly actions can bring this menace under absolute control. I believe that it is clarion call to adopt environment friendly measures to improve the pathetic conditions of biodiversity.
Since the ever growing population has given birth to elevated demands, the annihilation of plants and animals are obvious to cater the demands. Seemingly, deforestation and mass killing of animals for food and their fashionable items is now common for man and it is quite arduous for humans to shun the usage of these items . Also it is biased to over the facts documented by WHO that Chinese government is grabbing the forest land and slaughtering the animals on large scale just to build suitable accommodation for its citizenry. Despite of this, I believe that humanity can still follow environmental favoring alternative to save the humanity from destruction.
On the other side, a slight change in the humans action would save the whole biodiversity as human's efforts have direct nexus on the plants and animals. The government around the world must come forward and under the auspices of UNO, a body should be formulated to keep the check on deforestation as it is root cause disappearance of endangered species. To exemplify, as per the report published by Times Magazine, in the gone calendar year, Finland is one of the first nations which have outlawed the deforestation which eventually save millions of species from extinction and soil erosion. Hence, the are some effective methods to recover the adverse effects.
To conclusion, although massive destruction of flora and fauna is necessary evil which is essential to cater the elevated demand, in order to maintain the ecological cycle of nature it is imperative to adopt eco friendly measures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... humans to shun the usage of these items . Also it is biased to over the facts doc...
^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...mans to shun the usage of these items . Also it is biased to over the facts document...
^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... the other side, a slight change in the humans action would save the whole biodiversit...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...animals. The government around the world must come forward and under the auspices...
^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inland is one of the first nations which have outlawed the deforestation which ev...
^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...om extinction and soil erosion. Hence, the are some effective methods to recover the a...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rative to adopt eco friendly measures.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25949367089 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92601672989 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617088607595 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.1948212442 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214169127632 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697855155135 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637299445142 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107373426174 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721600292821 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.