Every action has a consequence, we have made a tremendous progress in terms of life but on the other hand a great sacrifice was made by nature. Developments in infrastructure have made our cities beautiful but at the same time it has depleted the other living beings in the ecosystem. Our activities have caused serious trouble for both flora and fauna , will continue to harm them if immediate actions are not taken.
Major effects of our modernisation are clearly visible on our climate. We have destroyed natural habitat of many animals by invading the forest land and creating buildings which forces those animals to move out. In the name fashion we have brutalised animals for the leather and other ornamental use. Similarly plants were also not spared, large vegetation were destroyed to accommodate increasing population.
Many species are now extinct and it would be difficult to review them because urbanisation has forced an ecological change where it will be impossible to provide them similar atmosphere where they naturally breed.
Although reverting back change may seem impossible but with little efforts change can be seen in various habitats. For instance, if we all unite and pledge to plan at least one tree and look after the needy animals things can turnaround. many such organisations are already working for them , we just have to provide our support no matter how small it can be but it can have ripple effect. Such example can be seen in some barren lands where animals were given freedom to roam without any interference and they were able to built anew ecosystem.
In conclusion, things can change drastically over the time if we all unite and take responsibility our creating a better environment for everyone. Nature should be given priority and some amends require from all over the world .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'tremendous progress'.
Suggestion: tremendous progress
... action has a consequence, we have made a tremendous progress in terms of life but on the other hand ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...serious trouble for both flora and fauna , will continue to harm them if immediate...
^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...r the leather and other ornamental use. Similarly plants were also not spared, large vege...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...he needy animals things can turnaround. many such organisations are already working ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ganisations are already working for them , we just have to provide our support no ...
^^
Line 6, column 530, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...interference and they were able to built anew ecosystem. In conclusion, things...
^^
Line 8, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e amends require from all over the world .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, similarly, so, as for, at least, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05298013245 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73078737318 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602649006623 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0364241955 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16436451214 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581001963124 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306406457694 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088743318166 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265274266749 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.