It is witnessed across the globe that natural sites are being replaced by people for their needs of shelter. Due to it, a great portion of our prestigious beautiful spots are already been swallowed on the name of urbanization. I will stress out in this essay about the advantages of preserving these sites and how to solve this in a pragmatic way.
There are innumerable reasons to support the idea of preventing these beautiful piece of lands. At the top of all there comes the indispensable role that these sites play for the people living near to it. Such places are needed for people to remove stress and anxiety with regards to their competitive life. They usually visit to these with their families to spend a quality time and for the sake of good health. Along with it, these land sites are also a destination for various migratory birds. These birds also help to keep alive our ecosystem. As a matter of fact, 'Harrikae' wet lands close to Amritsar are famous for bird species that comes every year from Asia and with these dolphins also arrives to keep running the food chain.
In order to curb these diminishing spots, authorities must take the appropriate decisions and people must adhere to these. One such step is to control the inclining population. By keeping a close a eye on population growth and by educating the people, the demand for the housing could be declined. For an instance, in China there is a heavy tax to be payed for next child due to which people are planning adequately and expansion of areas is suppressed greatly. Moreover, these sites must be developed to attract tourism and with the income generated from it could be further utilized to develop the rural areas to meet the land requirements.
Considering and keenly examining all the above-cited information there is a great scope of preventing such natural sites. A little awareness at ground level and with strong vision this issue can be curbed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pragmatic way" with adverb for "pragmatic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rving these sites and how to solve this in a pragmatic way. There are innumerable reasons to su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nclining population. By keeping a close a eye on population growth and by educati...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, as to, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8328358209 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56953379009 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3964141357 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2352941176 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94117647059 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157106489399 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511683828908 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040417367381 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110542886092 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529831017693 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.